Previously featured in Asylum Magazine. Seraphim Rose and the Occult Stack In 1975, Hieromonk Seraphim Rose wrote a book called Orthodoxy and the Religion of the Future, where he identified a list of sci-fi tropes which correspond to “the everyday reality of occult and demonic experience through the ages,” and the “standard claims of sorcerers and demons.” These tropes include: communication by telepathy, ambition to fly, materialize or dematerialize, traveling at speeds beyond any existing technology, the ability to transform the appearances of things by means of pure thought, and a philosophy which is beyond all religions, where intelligence is not dependent on matter. We will refer to Rose’s list as the
The actual quote: "We want to glorify war - the only cure for the world - militarism,
patriotism, the destructive gesture of the anarchists, the beautiful ideas
which kill, and contempt for woman"... telling, that which you removed. The critical inversion that robs political meaning "to feed the unknown and enrich the unfathomable reservoirs of
You say technology is heading towards a giant horrible panopticon and also we should embrace, it? WTF? I sentence you to read Uncle Ted's manifesto ten times followed by some Heidegger and Jacques Ellul.
This is a great essay that lays it all out there but I'm still trying to digest. Intrinsically I prefer option #2 and I guess that makes me a faggot. But I also appreciate the beauty of masculinity in its true form. My worry about speed is that it ultimately leads to a crash. But all things come to an end, no? Buddhism tells us to embrace our death.
The actual quote: "We want to glorify war - the only cure for the world - militarism,
patriotism, the destructive gesture of the anarchists, the beautiful ideas
which kill, and contempt for woman"... telling, that which you removed. The critical inversion that robs political meaning "to feed the unknown and enrich the unfathomable reservoirs of
the Absurd"
You say technology is heading towards a giant horrible panopticon and also we should embrace, it? WTF? I sentence you to read Uncle Ted's manifesto ten times followed by some Heidegger and Jacques Ellul.
This is a great essay that lays it all out there but I'm still trying to digest. Intrinsically I prefer option #2 and I guess that makes me a faggot. But I also appreciate the beauty of masculinity in its true form. My worry about speed is that it ultimately leads to a crash. But all things come to an end, no? Buddhism tells us to embrace our death.
So your solution to what Marinetti would have called "passatismo" is more passatismo?